RE: [v9 0/9] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - IOMMU part

From: Wu, Feng
Date: Sun Jun 07 2015 - 21:23:36 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joro@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 9:34 PM
> To: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Wu, Feng; dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [v9 0/9] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support - IOMMU part
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:47:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Feng Wu wrote:
> > > Divide the whole series which contain multiple components into three
> parts:
> > > - Prerequisite changes to irq subsystem (already merged in tip tree x86/apic
> branch)
> > > - IOMMU part (in this series)
> >
> > Please add
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Which tree should this go through? It depends on tip/x86/apic AFAICT,
> > so we can take it through that, if Joerg provides his ACK.
>
> Yeah, these changes depend on tip/x86/apic, so it doesn't make sense to
> send them through the iommu tree. There will be some conflicts when
> merging tip/x86/apic and the iommu tree together, though, mainly because
> of the vt-d kdump fixing patches I have in my tree. The conflicts are
> spread over 3 files, but not too serious and easy to resolve.
>
> Anyway, you have my
>
> Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
>
> for those.
>

Hi Joerg,

Thanks for your ACK on this series!

Hi Thomas,

Thanks a lot for your review!

Do you need me to send another version which adds the reviewed-by and acked-by tags,
or you can do it yourself on this version and merge it to tip/x86/apic?

Thanks,
Feng

>
> Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/