Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: Send one IPI per CPU to TLB flush all entries after unmapping pages

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:47:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1289,6 +1289,18 @@ enum perf_event_task_context {
> >  	perf_nr_task_contexts,
> >  };
> >  
> > +/* Track pages that require TLB flushes */
> > +struct tlbflush_unmap_batch {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Each bit set is a CPU that potentially has a TLB entry for one of
> > +	 * the PFNs being flushed. See set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending().
> > +	 */
> > +	struct cpumask cpumask;
> > +
> > +	/* True if any bit in cpumask is set */
> > +	bool flush_required;
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct task_struct {
> >  	volatile long state;	/* -1 unrunnable, 0 runnable, >0 stopped */
> >  	void *stack;
> > @@ -1648,6 +1660,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> >  	unsigned long numa_pages_migrated;
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
> > +	struct tlbflush_unmap_batch *tlb_ubc;
> > +#endif
> 
> Please embedd this constant size structure in task_struct directly so that the 
> whole per task allocation overhead goes away:
> 

That puts a structure (72 bytes in the config I used) within the task struct
even when it's not required. On a lightly loaded system direct reclaim
will not be active and for some processes, it'll never be active. It's
very wasteful.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/