Re: [PATCH] clockevents: check 'state' instead of 'mode' in suspend/resume path

From: Alexandre Belloni
Date: Thu Jun 18 2015 - 10:26:22 EST


On 17/06/2015 at 16:04:46 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote :
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_* macros are present for backward compatibility (as most
> of the drivers are still using old ->set_mode() interface).
>
> These macro's shouldn't be used anymore in code, that is common to both
> driver interfaces, i.e. ->set_mode() and ->set_state_*().
>
> Drivers implementing ->set_state_*() interface, which have their
> clkevt->mode set to 0 (clkevt device structures are normally globally
> defined), will not participate in suspend/resume as they will always be
> marked as UNUSED.
>
> Fix this by checking state of the clockevent device instead of mode,
> which is updated for both the interfaces.
>
> Fixes: ac34ad27fc16 ("clockevents: Do not suspend/resume if unused")
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> kernel/time/clockevents.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> index 2397b97320d8..08ccc3da3ca0 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ void clockevents_suspend(void)
> struct clock_event_device *dev;
>
> list_for_each_entry_reverse(dev, &clockevent_devices, list)
> - if (dev->suspend && dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED)
> + if (dev->suspend && !clockevent_state_detached(dev))
> dev->suspend(dev);
> }
>
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ void clockevents_resume(void)
> struct clock_event_device *dev;
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &clockevent_devices, list)
> - if (dev->resume && dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED)
> + if (dev->resume && !clockevent_state_detached(dev))
> dev->resume(dev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.4.0
>

--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/