Re: [PATCH v4 14/17] x86/asm/entry/64: Migrate error and interrupt exit work to C

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Fri Jul 03 2015 - 12:27:40 EST


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If we move even more of this stuff into C, then this problem goes away. "call
>> enter_from_user_mode" turns into "enter_from_user_mode()" or similar.
>
> Yes. I think we should first see how that process works out, and then see what
> else can be done. For the initial step I'm willing to trade up to 10 cycles in
> exchange for sane and maintainable x86 entry code that we can then speed up ...
>
> I presume we are still within that budget?
>

I haven't benchmarked very carefully. IIRC syscall timing was
unaffected by this series. Exceptions ought to be unaffected unless
something very weird is going on with the trace cache or branch
predictor. IRQs will slow down by a couple cycles (I'm guessing 5,
since it's more or less the same change I benchmarked when I was
playing with the next pile of patches).

My current plan is to try to send the 32-bit asm changes some time
next week (after I find a vm86-using DOS game to test) and then the
actual performance-affecting patch after that.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/