Re: [PATCH 2/3] brcmfmac: dhd_sdio.c: use existing atomic_or primitive

[Arend van Spriel]

On 07/09/2015 10:13 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> There's already a generic implementation so use that instead.

There is or there was? If there is now I am fine with this patch, but if 
it already was there the author might have had a reason for adding a 
local function and I would like to hear that reason.

> ---
> I'm not sure if the driver usage of atomic_or?() is correct in terms of
> storage size of @val for 64 bit arches.
>
> Assuming LP64 programming model for linux on say x86_64: atomic_or()
> callers in this driver use long (sana 64 bit) storage and pass it to
> atomic_orr/atomic_or which downcasts it to 32 bits. Is that OK ?

The function is used with 32bit register value from the device so I 
think it is ok.

Regards,
Arend

> ---
> Cc: Brett Rudley <brudley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Kim <dekim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: brcm80211-dev-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 13 ++-----------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index d36f5f3d931b..f990e3d0e696 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -2564,15 +2564,6 @@ static inline void brcmf_sdio_clrintr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   	}
>   }
>
> -static void atomic_orr(int val, atomic_t *v)
> -{
> -	int old_val;
> -
> -	old_val = atomic_read(v);
> -	while (atomic_cmpxchg(v, old_val, val | old_val) != old_val)
> -		old_val = atomic_read(v);
> -}
> -
>   static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   {
>   	struct brcmf_core *buscore;
> @@ -2595,7 +2586,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_intr_rstatus(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>   	if (val) {
>   		brcmf_sdiod_regwl(bus->sdiodev, addr, val, &ret);
>   		bus->sdcnt.f1regdata++;
> -		atomic_orr(val, &bus->intstatus);
> +		atomic_or(val, &bus->intstatus);
>   	}
>
>   	return ret;
> @@ -2712,7 +2703,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_dpc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
>
>   	/* Keep still-pending events for next scheduling */
>   	if (intstatus)
> -		atomic_orr(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
> +		atomic_or(intstatus, &bus->intstatus);
>
>   	brcmf_sdio_clrintr(bus);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/