Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri Jul 10 2015 - 10:21:04 EST


On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Now perhaps it is a good thing in the end. At least in nohz full it
> doesn't change anything as we affine that workqueue too. But we must
> be sure that a single NUMA node is enough to handle typical loads of
> usermodehelper.

This is configurable right? So if you screw up you are responsible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/