Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] sched: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking

From: Dietmar Eggemann
Date: Fri Jul 24 2015 - 12:41:42 EST


Hi Yuyang,

On 15/07/15 01:04, Yuyang Du wrote:

[...]

> @@ -4674,7 +4487,7 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg)
> /*
> * w = rw_i + @wl
> */
> - w = se->my_q->load.weight + wl;
> + w = se->my_q->avg.load_avg + wl;
>
> /*
> * wl = S * s'_i; see (2)

There is a comment 'Per the above, wl is the new *se->load.weight*
value'. This should be replaced by *se->avg.load_avg*. Also the function
header explains the functionality of effective_load() based on weight
and not sched_avg::load_avg.

> @@ -4695,7 +4508,7 @@ static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg)
> /*
> * wl = dw_i = S * (s'_i - s_i); see (3)
> */
> - wl -= se->load.weight;
> + wl -= se->avg.load_avg;
>
> /*
> * Recursively apply this logic to all parent groups to compute
> @@ -4769,14 +4582,14 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
> */
> if (sync) {
> tg = task_group(current);
> - weight = current->se.load.weight;
> + weight = current->se.avg.load_avg;
>
> this_load += effective_load(tg, this_cpu, -weight, -weight);
> load += effective_load(tg, prev_cpu, 0, -weight);
> }
>
> tg = task_group(p);
> - weight = p->se.load.weight;
> + weight = p->se.avg.load_avg;

You changed cfs_rq->load.weight to cfs_rq->avg.load_avg and
se->load.weight to se->avg.load_avg in effective_load() and
wake_affine() in v2.
I wasn't able to find explanation why you did this. I mean we still have
to maintain 'struct load_weight' on cfs_rq's and se's representing tg's.

-- Dietmar

[...]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/