Re: [PATCH] parport: Revert "parport: fix memory leak"

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 01:19:40PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 2) Why the dmesg showed "panel: could not claim access to parport0. Aborting."?
> 	Because of 50566ac87065 ("parport: check exclusive access before
> 	register") the panel driver should not even register and it
> 	should have failed at parport_register_dev_model().
Because panel is not claiming exclusive access of parport.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/