Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] ARM: imx: Add suspend codes for imx7D

From: Shawn Guo
Date: Tue Jul 28 2015 - 10:31:10 EST


On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:16:20PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > The files are named with "-imx7". It's a clear sign that the build of the files
> > should be controlled by something like related to "imx7".
> > Ideally, it should be CONFIG_SOC_IMX7. Since imx7d is the only supported imx7
> > soc and there is no CONFIG_SOC_IMX7 available so far, it falls on
> > CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D.
>
> We can also interpret "-imx7" is the first SoC which has the GPCv2 block.

In that case you should name the block gpc-imx7d rather than gpcv2 and
symbol as GPC_IMX7D rather than IMX_GPCV2.

> > > > > +extern struct imx_gpcv2_irq *gpcv2_irq_instance;
> > > >
> > > > Will this give a checkpatch warning?
> > >
> > > Yes. Any suggestion for that? Move it to a header file?
> >
> > Get rid of it.
>
> Then you may resolve the following compile error:

You didn't get my point. Rather than defining it as a global variable,
we should try to keep imx_gpcv2_irq as an internal data structure to
irqchip driver, and use well-defined interface to access the data from
pm driver when necessary.

Shawn

>
> CC arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.o
> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c: In function âimx_gpcv2_pm_initâ:
> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c:836:7: error: âgpcv2_irq_instanceâ undeclared (first use in this function)
> cd = gpcv2_irq_instance;
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c:836:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.o] Error 1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/