Re: [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform data

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Jul 28 2015 - 13:08:30 EST


On 07/28/2015 08:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:

On 07/28/2015 08:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul, at 12:37:21PM, Lee Jones wrote:

The driver shouldn't be called that either.

You are the only one. What makes iTCO 'special'?

I don't know, I didn't write it. It looks like Wim did ~9 years ago, so
it must have made sense to him at the time.


Coding style wasn't as strict then as it is today. iTCO has just been kept
for historic reasons.

For sure, I get that, but it doesn't mean we can't do-the-right-thing
(tm) now does it?

Sure, we could have changed it to lowercase, but so far no one bothered.
Plus, of course, there is always the element that some maintainers hate
that kind of cleanup,

Really? Surely any kind of clean-up is good clean-up. Especially as
Greg KH et. al, have been doing public presentations telling everyone
that there is always kernel work for anyone who has the time; spelling
corrections and all.


Yes, really. Just try to submit cleanup patches to maintainers other than
Greg and myself, and you'll see. It is a minefield.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/