[PATCH 3.2 098/164] xen/events: don't bind non-percpu VIRQs with percpu chip

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sat Aug 01 2015 - 20:28:25 EST


3.2.70-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 77bb3dfdc0d554befad58fdefbc41be5bc3ed38a upstream.

A non-percpu VIRQ (e.g., VIRQ_CONSOLE) may be freed on a different
VCPU than it is bound to. This can result in a race between
handle_percpu_irq() and removing the action in __free_irq() because
handle_percpu_irq() does not take desc->lock. The interrupt handler
sees a NULL action and oopses.

Only use the percpu chip/handler for per-CPU VIRQs (like VIRQ_TIMER).

# cat /proc/interrupts | grep virq
40: 87246 0 xen-percpu-virq timer0
44: 0 0 xen-percpu-virq debug0
47: 0 20995 xen-percpu-virq timer1
51: 0 0 xen-percpu-virq debug1
69: 0 0 xen-dyn-virq xen-pcpu
74: 0 0 xen-dyn-virq mce
75: 29 0 xen-dyn-virq hvc_console

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust filename, context, indentation]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c | 2 +-
drivers/xen/events.c | 12 ++++++++----
include/xen/events.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int __init xen_hvc_init(void)

if (xen_initial_domain()) {
ops = &dom0_hvc_ops;
- xencons_irq = bind_virq_to_irq(VIRQ_CONSOLE, 0);
+ xencons_irq = bind_virq_to_irq(VIRQ_CONSOLE, 0, false);
} else {
if (!xen_start_info->console.domU.evtchn)
return -ENODEV;
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int find_virq(unsigned int virq,
return rc;
}

-int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu)
+int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu, bool percpu)
{
struct evtchn_bind_virq bind_virq;
int evtchn, irq, ret;
@@ -909,8 +909,12 @@ int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq,
if (irq == -1)
goto out;

- irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &xen_percpu_chip,
- handle_percpu_irq, "virq");
+ if (percpu)
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &xen_percpu_chip,
+ handle_percpu_irq, "virq");
+ else
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &xen_dynamic_chip,
+ handle_edge_irq, "virq");

bind_virq.virq = virq;
bind_virq.vcpu = cpu;
@@ -1023,7 +1027,7 @@ int bind_virq_to_irqhandler(unsigned int
{
int irq, retval;

- irq = bind_virq_to_irq(virq, cpu);
+ irq = bind_virq_to_irq(virq, cpu, irqflags & IRQF_PERCPU);
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
retval = request_irq(irq, handler, irqflags, devname, dev_id);
--- a/include/xen/events.h
+++ b/include/xen/events.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irqhandler(unsigned i
irq_handler_t handler,
unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname,
void *dev_id);
-int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu);
+int bind_virq_to_irq(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu, bool percpu);
int bind_virq_to_irqhandler(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpu,
irq_handler_t handler,
unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/