Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Mon Aug 03 2015 - 00:24:35 EST


On 08/02/2015 02:49 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 19:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 08/01/2015 05:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.70 release.
There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Wed Aug 05 23:00:00 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.


Build results:
> total: 96 pass: 96 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
> total: 22 pass: 22 fail: 0

Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Thanks. I was checking there as I went along, which is why I added
patches 158-160. (It looks like you turned on some new config options
for those architectures recently, as the bugs those fix don't seem to
be triggered by earlier patches.)


Hi Ben,

I added several 'allnoconfig' and 'allmodconfig' builds. At the same time,
I changed the approach on how known failures are handled; those are now added
to an exception list which won't be built in the first place.

The current exception list for builds in 3.2 is:

alpha:allnoconfig
arm:allnoconfig
arm:allmodconfig
avr32:allnoconfig
m68k:allnoconfig
microblaze:allnoconfig
mips:allmodconfig
openrisc:allnoconfig
parisc:allnoconfig
sparc32:allmodconfig
xtensa:defconfig
xtensa:allmodconfig
xtensa:allnoconfig

and for qemu tests:

powerpc:qemu_virtex440_defconfig
arm:qemu_arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-a15
arm:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-a9
arm:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-a15

There may be more as I am adding more builds.

I didn't expect you to fix any of those. If you are, let me know,
and I'll drop the build/qemu exceptions.

Thanks,
Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/