Re: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 096/107] fsnotify: fix oops in fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags()

[Kamal Mostafa]

On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 17:12 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 05-08-15 14:49:28, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > 3.19.8-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> The patch was later reverted so please don't push it to stable.
> 
> 								Honza


Thanks very much Jan.  Dropped from 3.19-stable.

 -Kamal


> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > commit a2673b6e040663bf16a552f8619e6bde9f4b9acf upstream.
> > 
> > fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with
> > fsnotify_destroy_marks() so when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops
> > mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by
> > fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and we dereference free
> > memory in the loop there.
> > 
> > Fix the problem by keeping mark_mutex held in
> > fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked().  The reason why we drop that mutex is that
> > we need to call a ->freeing_mark() callback which may acquire mark_mutex
> > again.  To avoid this and similar lock inversion issues, we move the call
> > to ->freeing_mark() callback to the kthread destroying the mark.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/notify/mark.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
> > index 92e48c7..3e594ce4 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/mark.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
> > @@ -152,31 +152,15 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> >  		BUG();
> >  
> >  	list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> > -
> >  	spin_unlock(&mark->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (inode && (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_OBJECT_PINNED))
> >  		iput(inode);
> > -	/* release lock temporarily */
> > -	mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
> >  
> >  	spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> >  	list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
> >  	spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
> >  	wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We don't necessarily have a ref on mark from caller so the above destroy
> > -	 * may have actually freed it, unless this group provides a 'freeing_mark'
> > -	 * function which must be holding a reference.
> > -	 */
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Some groups like to know that marks are being freed.  This is a
> > -	 * callback to the group function to let it know that this mark
> > -	 * is being freed.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (group->ops->freeing_mark)
> > -		group->ops->freeing_mark(mark, group);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags(inode);
> > @@ -191,8 +175,6 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> >  	 */
> >  
> >  	atomic_dec(&group->num_marks);
> > -
> > -	mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void fsnotify_destroy_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> > @@ -205,7 +187,10 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Destroy all marks in the given list. The marks must be already detached from
> > - * the original inode / vfsmount.
> > + * the original inode / vfsmount. Note that we can race with
> > + * fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags(). However we hold a reference to each
> > + * mark so they won't get freed from under us and nobody else touches our
> > + * free_list list_head.
> >   */
> >  void fsnotify_destroy_marks(struct list_head *to_free)
> >  {
> > @@ -406,7 +391,7 @@ struct fsnotify_mark *fsnotify_find_mark(struct hlist_head *head,
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > - * clear any marks in a group in which mark->flags & flags is true
> > + * Clear any marks in a group in which mark->flags & flags is true.
> >   */
> >  void fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> >  					 unsigned int flags)
> > @@ -460,6 +445,7 @@ static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
> >  {
> >  	struct fsnotify_mark *mark, *next;
> >  	struct list_head private_destroy_list;
> > +	struct fsnotify_group *group;
> >  
> >  	for (;;) {
> >  		spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
> > @@ -471,6 +457,14 @@ static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
> >  
> >  		list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, g_list) {
> >  			list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
> > +			group = mark->group;
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Some groups like to know that marks are being freed.
> > +			 * This is a callback to the group function to let it
> > +			 * know that this mark is being freed.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (group && group->ops->freeing_mark)
> > +				group->ops->freeing_mark(mark, group);
> >  			fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
> >  		}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/