Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip, gicv3: Workaround for Cavium ThunderX erratum 23154

From: Robert Richter
Date: Thu Aug 13 2015 - 12:18:13 EST


Marc,

thanks for your quick review.

On 13.08.15 16:11:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 13/08/15 15:47, Robert Richter wrote:
> > From: Robert Richter <rrichter@xxxxxxxxxx>

> > static const struct gic_capabilities gicv3_errata[] = {
> > {
> > + .desc = "GIC: Cavium erratum 23154",
> > + .iidr = 0xa100034c, /* ThunderX pass 1.x */
> > + .iidr_mask = 0xffff0fff,
> > + .init = gicv3_enable_cavium_thunderx,
> > + },
>
> I'm even more puzzled. You're working around a CPU bug based on the ITS
> ID registers? Or have you swapped the detection methods for the two errata?

:/ Right, I mixed this up... Must have starred on this for too long.
Will fix that.

Wrt midr: Originally this was written to support iidr. I wanted to
keep the version check in the driver of the hw, an implementation
outside of drivers/irqchip looked not appropriate here as it would
rely then on arch arm64 only. This is the main reason. Apart from
that, I think an implmentation based on struct arm64_cpu_capabilities,
etc. would require much rework compared to my current easy
implementation, e.g:

* binding flags to callbacks and actually run them,

* handing over private driver data (base addr for iidr detection) to
a capabilty's match function.

Overall this looked bloated. Now, that the MIDR also needs to be
checked, it looked better to me to keep the gic hw detection at a
single location in the driver. This also allows us to check a
combination of midr and iidr values.

I hope this sounds reasonable?

-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/