Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: configfs: add MTP function

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Aug 13 2015 - 15:57:59 EST


On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 09:34:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/13/2015 09:12 PM, Amit Pundir wrote:
> >his MTP function is based on years of work originally done in the
> >Android kernel tree by:
> > Mike Lockwood<lockwood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Benoit Goby<benoit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Colin Cross<ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Arve Hjønnevåg<arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Peter Oh<poh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Greg Hackmann<ghackmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Badhri Jagan Sridharan<Badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >I've folded the series up to make it easier to review, and to provide
> >a coherent patch description.
> >
> >Post Gingerbread (Android v2.3), Android dropped USB Mass Storage
> >in favor of Media Transfer Protocal (MTP), which is widely used for
> >transferring media files to digital music players and similar
> >applications. This USB gadget function implements MTP functionalty.
> >
> >Historically this function has been a part of Android composite
> >gadget driver. Android composite driver was Android's solution
> >for dynamic gadget function switching prior to the ConfigFS gadget
> >being merged. There were failed few attempts in past
> >http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=132451695808552 to upstream Android
> >composite driver as well. Now this Android MTP gadget function has been
> >re-implemented so as to be used as a generic ConfigFS function instead.
> >
> >Again, many thanks to Mike, Benoit, Colin, Arve, Peter, Greg and Badhri,
> >as they are the real authors of this work. However, I've folded their
> >patches together and modified it enough that I don't want them to be
> >blamed for any mistakes I've made condensing their patches down.
> >
> >Cc: Mike Lockwood<lockwood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Benoit Goby<benoit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Colin Cross<ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg<arve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Peter Oh<poh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Greg Hackmann<ghackmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Badhri Jagan Sridharan<Badhri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Android Kernel Team<kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Jonathan Corbet<corbet@xxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Felipe Balbi<balbi@xxxxxx>
> >Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz<andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Laurent Pinchart<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Yegor Yefremov<yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Philippe Reynes<tremyfr@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: John Stultz<john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Sumit Semwal<sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir<amit.pundir@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In my humble opinion adding such function to Linux kernel doesn't make any
> sense. By design, MTP is a protocol which requires access to userspace
> features esp. file system. It is very important to run MTP daemon with
> suitable user and LSM label and many many other issues which should be
> handled by userspace access policy.
>
> Moreover this is not a fully functional USB function but only some interface
> which can be used by mtp-responder (mtp-daemon - call it as you like) to
> communicate with host. As we have FunctionFS which allows to implement any
> USB function in as a userspace service. As MTP nature is more related to
> userspace I think that porting MTP daemon to use this is a right way to go.
> This should be much more reasonable than adding new function which also
> requires daemon for proper working. So why add another interface while we
> can use a generic one?

Isn't there already a userspace MTP daemon that uses the existing
functionfs for usb gadgets? I thought I remember seeing that
somewhere...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/