Re: [PATCH V8 08/25] perf tools: Add Intel BTS support

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Aug 18 2015 - 12:10:19 EST


Em Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:39:46AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 17/08/15 22:58, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:09:26PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >> On 17/08/2015 8:58 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Em Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:43:09PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >>>> On 17/08/2015 6:52 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>>>> 1.92% usleep [unknown] [.] 0x00007fa0ff695086
> >>>>> 1.60% usleep [unknown] [.] 0xffffffff811c91d0
> >>>>> 1.48% usleep [unknown] [.] 0x00007fa0ffb3030d
> >>>>> 1.24% usleep [unknown] [.] 0x00007fa0ff6950c7
> >>>
> >>>> It is very weird that it doesn't know the dso.
> >>>
> >>>> I presume there is nothing unusual about the environment e.g. in a chroot or anything
> >>>
> >>>> What if you try a different event e.g. perf record --per-thread -e cycles sleep 1
> >>>
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf record --per-thread -e cycles sleep 1
> >>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> >>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.014 MB perf.data (9 samples) ]
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf report | grep -v ^# | head -5
> >>> 42.57% sleep libc-2.20.so [.] malloc_hook_ini
> >>> 41.81% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] filemap_fault
> >>> 14.35% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] flush_tlb_mm_range
> >>> 1.18% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] strlcpy
> >>> 0.09% sleep [kernel.vmlinux] [k] native_write_msr_safe
> >>> [root@zoo ~]#
> >>>
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf report --dsos libc-2.20.so | grep -v '^[#]'
> >>> 42.57% sleep [.] malloc_hook_ini
> >>>
> >>> [root@zoo ~]#
> >>>
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf record --per-thread -e intel_bts// usleep 1
> >>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> >>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.825 MB perf.data ]
> >>> [root@zoo ~]# perf report | grep -v ^# | head -5
> >>> Warning:
> >>> 79074 instruction trace errors
> >>> 2.80% usleep [unknown] [.] 0x00007f48888aa061
> >>> [root@zoo ~]#
> >>
> >> Running out of ideas. Can you somehow share or send me the offending perf.data file?
> >
> > http://vger.kernel.org/~acme/perf/perf.data.intel_bts-4.2.0-rc5+.xz
>
> Says: You don't have permission to access
> /~acme/perf/perf.data.intel_bts-4.2.0-rc5+.xz on this server.

Ooops, fixed.

> > It works if I use a tip/master kernel:
> >
> > [root@perf4 ~]# uname -r
> > 4.2.0-rc7+
> > [root@perf4 ~]# uname -r
> > 4.2.0-rc7+
> > [root@perf4 ~]# perf record --per-thread -e intel_bts// usleep 1
> > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.785 MB perf.data ]
> > [root@perf4 ~]# dmesg | grep Performance
> > [ 0.188477] Performance Events: PEBS fmt2+, 16-deep LBR, Broadwell
> > events, full-width counters, Intel PMU driver.
> > [root@perf4 ~]# perf report --stdio | grep -v ^# | head -10
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 10.81% usleep libc-2.17.so [.] _dl_addr
> > 6.56% usleep [kernel.kallsyms] [.] unmap_single_vma
> > 3.33% usleep ld-2.17.so [.] strcmp
> > 2.53% usleep [kernel.kallsyms] [.] mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat
> > 2.49% usleep ld-2.17.so [.] _dl_lookup_symbol_x
> > 2.39% usleep ld-2.17.so [.] _dl_relocate_object
> > [root@perf4 ~]#
> >
> > Probably some fix for the kernel driver is missing?
>
> Works for me though.

Works for you if you test in lockstep the tooling with the kernel
sources, right? It works for me as well, if I use the latest tip/master
tooling _and_ kernel, my report was for using the 4.2.0-rc latest for
the kernel and the tooling in tip/master.

I think this would be just a matter of having a better message, or
perhaps some fix that we need to send to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx guys, so
that the new tooling works with a slightly older kernel.

Anyway, consider looking at that perf.data file that I fixed the
permissions on vger, and I will look at the fix you mentioned in another
message.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/