Re: [PATCH 1/1] memhp: Add hot-added memory ranges to memblock before allocate node_data for a node.

From: Xishi Qiu
Date: Mon Aug 24 2015 - 21:10:26 EST


On 2015/8/24 17:22, Xishi Qiu wrote:

> On 2015/8/24 1:06, Tang Chen wrote:
>
>> The commit below adds hot-added memory range to memblock, after
>> creating pgdat for new node.
>>
>> commit f9126ab9241f66562debf69c2c9d8fee32ddcc53
>> Author: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri Aug 14 15:35:16 2015 -0700
>>
>> memory-hotplug: fix wrong edge when hot add a new node
>>
>> But there is a problem:
>>
>> add_memory()
>> |--> hotadd_new_pgdat()
>> |--> free_area_init_node()
>> |--> get_pfn_range_for_nid()
>> |--> find start_pfn and end_pfn in memblock
>> |--> ......
>> |--> memblock_add_node(start, size, nid) -------- Here, just too late.
>>
>> get_pfn_range_for_nid() will find that start_pfn and end_pfn are both 0.
>> As a result, when adding memory, dmesg will give the following wrong message.
>>

Hi Tang,

Another question, if we add cpu first, there will be print error too.

cpu_up()
try_online_node()
hotadd_new_pgdat()

So how about just skip the print if the size is empty or just print
"node xx is empty now, will update when online memory"?

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

>> [ 2007.577000] Initmem setup node 5 [mem 0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
>> [ 2007.584000] On node 5 totalpages: 0
>> [ 2007.585000] Built 5 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 32588823
>> [ 2007.594000] Policy zone: Normal
>> [ 2007.598000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x60000000000-0x607ffffffff]
>>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/