Re: [PATCH]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition

From: Dan Williams
Date: Sat Aug 29 2015 - 11:22:33 EST


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
> ACPI 6.0 NFIT Memory Device State Flags in Table 5-129 defines
> bit 3 as follows.
>
> Bit [3] set to 1 to indicate that the Memory Device is observed
> to be not armed prior to OSPM hand off. A Memory Device is
> considered armed if it is able to accept persistent writes.
>
> This bit is currently defined as ACPI_NFIT_MEM_ARMED, which can be
> confusing as if the Memory Device is armed when this bit is set.
>
> Change the name to ACPI_NFIT_MEM_NOT_ARMED per the spec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/