Re: [PATCH 12/14] arm64: Check for selected granule support

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Wed Sep 02 2015 - 06:19:15 EST


On 2 September 2015 at 11:48, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 13 August 2015 at 19:29, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:45:07PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>>> On 13/08/15 13:28, Steve Capper wrote:
>>> >On 13 August 2015 at 12:34, Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> __enable_mmu:
>>> >>+ mrs x1, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
>>> >>+ ubfx x2, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR0_TGran_SHIFT, 4
>>> >>+ cmp x2, #ID_AA64MMFR0_TGran_ENABLED
>>> >>+ b.ne __no_granule_support
>>> >> ldr x5, =vectors
>>> >> msr vbar_el1, x5
>>> >> msr ttbr0_el1, x25 // load TTBR0
>>> >>@@ -626,3 +643,8 @@ __enable_mmu:
>>> >> isb
>>> >> br x27
>>> >> ENDPROC(__enable_mmu)
>>> >>+
>>> >>+__no_granule_support:
>>> >>+ wfe
>>> >>+ b __no_granule_support
>>> >>+ENDPROC(__no_granule_support)
>>> >>--
>>> >>1.7.9.5
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Is is possible to tell the user that the kernel has failed to boot due
>>> >to the kernel granule being unsupported?
>>>
>>> We don't have anything up at this time. The "looping address" is actually a clue
>>> to the (expert) user. Not sure we can do something, until we get something like DEBUG_LL(?)
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> Or we should let it continue and end in a panic(?). The current situation can boot a
>>> multi-cluster system with boot cluster having the Tgran support(which doesn't make a
>>> strong use case though). I will try out some options and get back to you.
>>
>> If the boot CPU does not support 16KB pages, in general there isn't much
>> we can do since the console printing is done after we enabled the MMU.
>> Even mapping the UART address requires fixmap support and the PAGE_SIZE
>> is hard-coded in the kernel image. The DT is also mapped at run-time.
>>
>> While in theory it's possible to fall back to a 4KB page size just
>> enough to load the DT and figure out the early console, I suggest we
>> just live with the "looping address" clue.
>>
>
> Couldn't we allocate some flag bits in the Image header to communicate
> the page size to the bootloader?

Something like this perhaps?

------------8<---------------
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
index 7d9d3c2286b2..13a8aaa9a6e9 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ Header notes:
- The flags field (introduced in v3.17) is a little-endian 64-bit field
composed as follows:
Bit 0: Kernel endianness. 1 if BE, 0 if LE.
- Bits 1-63: Reserved.
+ Bits 1-2: Kernel page size. 0=unspecified, 1=4K, 2=16K, 3=64K
+ Bits 3-63: Reserved.

- When image_size is zero, a bootloader should attempt to keep as much
memory as possible free for use by the kernel immediately after the
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
index 8fae0756e175..5def289bda84 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/image.h
@@ -47,7 +47,9 @@
#define __HEAD_FLAG_BE 0
#endif

-#define __HEAD_FLAGS (__HEAD_FLAG_BE << 0)
+#define __HEAD_FLAG_PAGE_SIZE ((PAGE_SHIFT - 10) / 2)
+
+#define __HEAD_FLAGS (__HEAD_FLAG_BE << 0) | (__HEAD_FLAG_PAGE_SIZE << 1)

/*
* These will output as part of the Image header, which should be little-endian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/