Re: stop breaking dosemu (Re: x86/kconfig/32: Rename CONFIG_VM86 and default it to 'n')

[Raymond Jennings]

On 09/04/15 14:30, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 05.09.2015 00:16, Stas Sergeev ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > I agree. vm86() is a mess.
> > My point is that its risky parts and useless funtionality
> > is _already_ known (even I can point to the particular code
> > parts than can simply be removed). As such, it simply had
> > to be re-visited and cleaned up to match at least 1 and 3
> > (and then maybe 5). This wasn't done, and the knob was
> > introduced _instead_ of doing this.
> Grr, I mean it was disabled by default instead of doing this,
> and the knob was only proposed, not added.

You can't just pull vm86 out of the kernel anyway.  dosemu is a 
userspace application that depends on it, so pulling this feature out 
would be a big fat regression, period.

I would personally rather not hear about how "it's a legacy program so 
its userbase is shrinking" used as any sort of excuse to ignore the fact 
that we shouldn't break userspace.

I can even say as a user that vm86 is important to me.

By all means, cleaning up vm86 is a good idea.  But removing it or 
fencing it off with a strong deprecation doesn't sound like the right idea.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/