Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] power: bq27x00_battery: Renaming for consistency

From: Andrew F. Davis
Date: Tue Sep 15 2015 - 12:53:59 EST


On 09/15/2015 03:32 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:26:08PM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
Rename functions that are used by multiple devices. New devices
have been added and the function names and driver name are no longer
general enough for the functionality they provide.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 2 +-
arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/power/Kconfig | 22 +-
drivers/power/Makefile | 2 +-
.../power/{bq27x00_battery.c => bq27xxx_battery.c} | 333 +++++++++++----------

1000 chips! That's how many potential chips is this driver supposed to
support, after the rename, with little or no modifications.Is it even
possible to guarantee that all future chips, starting with 'bq27' in
their naming scheme, are register compatible?

After this series we support three times as many chips, and almost none
of them follow the 27x00 naming (only the bq27000 and bq27200 ever did).

Also almost *none* of the new chips added are register compatible, that's
why this series moves register mapping to a table, but they all perform the
same task (fuel gauging) in almost the same way so it works well.

Call me conservative, but when I see driver names/renames containing
wildcards, I get chills down my spine. I can probably get over single
digit wildcards but 3 digit wildcards is a little too much. :)


Perhaps just bq27x :)

I can't help but wonder what will one have to do if one single newly
released bq27xxx chip is completely different... :/


If someday they make a part that is so different it doesn't fit in this
driver then it can be the oddball with its own named driver file.

Regards,
Andrew

laurentiu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/