Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] [media] v4l2: introduce v4l2_timeval

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 18 September 2015 11:52:28 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/18/15 11:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 18 September 2015 11:27:40 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> Ah, OK. Got it.
> >>
> >> I think this is dependent on the upcoming media workshop next month. If we
> >> decide to redesign v4l2_buffer anyway, then we can avoid timeval completely.
> >> And the only place where we would need to convert it in the compat code
> >> hidden in the v4l2 core (likely v4l2-ioctl.c).
> > 
> > Ah, I think I understood the idea now, I missed that earlier when you mention
> > the idea.
> > 
> > So what you are saying here is that you could come up with a new unambiguous
> > (using only __u32 and __u64 types and no pointers) format that gets exposed
> > to a new set of ioctls, and then change the handling of the existing three
> > formats (native 64-bit, traditional 32-bit, and 32-bit with 64-bit time_t)
> > so they get converted into the new format by the common ioctl handling code?
> 
> Right. Drivers only see the new struct, and only v4l2-ioctl.c (and possible
> v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c) see the old ones.
> 
> BTW, I will probably pick up patches 4 and 6 for 4.4. That should help a bit.

Ok, thanks!

I guess it's up to Mauro to pick up the first three patches?

As I don't see anything more to do for me here until you've had the
discussion about the new format, I'll move on to another subsystem now.
I have around 70 patches waiting to be submitted, plus the system call
series.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/