Re: [PATCH v2] netlink: Replace rhash_portid with bound

From: BjÃrn Mork
Date: Tue Sep 22 2015 - 16:40:15 EST


Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The PPRO_FENCE_BUG thing is rather questionable. I'm not sure it's
> even documented, but I can't find the official PPro errata now. I
> think I discussed it with Andy Glew back when Intel was starting to
> document the memory ordering rules.
>
> I'd be willing to get rid of it. It was apparently just an early
> stepping or two.
>
> Anybody with better google-fu than me who can find the official Intel
> PPro errata?

http://download.intel.com/design/archives/processors/pro/docs/24268935.pdf

Says "NoFix" for erratas 66 and 92.


BjÃrn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/