Re: [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3

From: Jani Nikula
Date: Thu Sep 24 2015 - 09:26:38 EST


On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, "davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:07:56AM +0000, Lankhorst, Maarten wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Dave Jones schreef op di 22-09-2015 om 21:49 [-0400]:
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of
> > > > > > their recent patches.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like this showed up before my recent work, but I think I might
> > > > have seen similar problems while working on atomic watermarks; the
> > > > issues I was seeing were because the initial hardware readout could
> > > > leave primary->visible set to true even when the CRTC was off. My
> > > > series (which is still under development) contains this patch to fix
> > > > that:
> > > >
> > > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/59564/
> > > >
> > > > Does applying that help with the problems reported here?
> > >
> > > No difference at all for me.
> > Looks like a (reopened) dup of 91952?
> >
> > Can you apply "[PATCH] drm/i915: Add primary plane to mask if it's
> > visible", and get me the results?
>
> This doesn't apply on top of Linus' current tree.
> If you let me know what it's dependant on, I'll do a build with
> those patches tomorrow.

It's now part of the drm-intel-fixes pull request [1], maybe it's
easiest to pull that in? Just four commits on top of
v4.3-rc2. Alternatively pick it up from our repo [2].

Thanks,
Jani.



[1] http://mid.gmane.org/87si646uyf.fsf@xxxxxxxxx
[2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-fixes&id=721a09f7393de6c28a07516dccd654c6e995944a

>
> Dave
>

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/