Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Thu Sep 24 2015 - 16:06:40 EST

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:52:35AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures
> when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need
> to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at