Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Sat Sep 26 2015 - 05:53:13 EST

> Your approach finds a function definition.

Yes. - I assumed that it might also be relevant.

> My approach works on the call directly, using whatever type information is available.

The connection between the SmPL specification "f(...)@e" and the desired return type
was not obvious for me so far.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at