Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable

From: Julia Lawall
Date: Sat Sep 26 2015 - 05:55:54 EST

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > Your approach finds a function definition.
> Yes. - I assumed that it might also be relevant.
> > My approach works on the call directly, using whatever type information is available.
> The connection between the SmPL specification "f(...)@e" and the desired return type
> was not obvious for me so far.

The nearest enclosing expression of the ) is the whole function call
itself. e will thus match the entire expression. e is declared to have
type t (where t is in practice signed int or whatever one wants to check

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at