Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Sep 27 2015 - 15:42:29 EST
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [[PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular] On 19/08/2015 (Wed 17:48) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [v2: drop dead module code removal from 8250_lpc18xx.c ; instead convert it
> > from bool to tristate ; also add ack to hvc_console commit.]
> > This second set of patches to drivers/tty steps outside of the serial
> > dir, and an improved auditing finds two more serial drivers pretending
> > to be modular that really are not.
> Hi Greg -- wondering if this is still in your to-do queue. I see the
> patches to drivers/char that I sent about the same time made it onto
> your char-testing branch but not these onto tty-testing.
Yes, they are in my queue, haven't caught up with tty patches yet :(
> The reason I ask is that I've about a 1/2 dozen more similar patches
> that showed up once I started auditing non-x86 code. I don't want to
> re-spam you with these along with the new ones, if these are still in
> your backlog for processing.
I can handle resends and other patches just fine, send away!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/