Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/11] sched: More notrace
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue Sep 29 2015 - 09:20:06 EST
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> preempt_schedule_common() is marked notrace, but it does not use
> _notrace() preempt_count functions and __schedule() is also not marked
> notrace, which means that its perfectly possible to end up in the
> tracer from preempt_schedule_common().
> So either we need more notrace, or we need to remove notrace from
More notrace is the right thing to do. We have enough pointless
information in tracing already.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/