Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: scale up timeout for full-chip erase

From: Brian Norris
Date: Tue Sep 29 2015 - 16:26:15 EST


On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:59:17PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch fixes timeout issues seen on large NOR flash (e.g., 16MB
> w25q128fw) when using ioctl(MEMERASE) with offset=0 and length=16M. The
> input parameters matter because spi_nor_erase() uses a different code
> path for full-chip erase, where we use the SPINOR_OP_CHIP_ERASE (0xc7)
> opcode.
>
> Fix: use a different timeout for full-chip erase than for other
> commands.
>
> While most operations can be expected to perform relatively similarly
> across a variety of NOR flash types and sizes (and therefore might as
> well use a similar timeout to keep things simple), full-chip erase is
> unique, because the time it typically takes to complete:
> (1) is much larger than most operations and
> (2) scales with the size of the flash.
>
> Let's base our timeout on the original comments stuck here -- that a 2MB
> flash requires max 40s to erase.
>
> Small survey of a few flash datasheets I have lying around:
>
> Chip Size (MB) Max chip erase (seconds)
> ---- -------- ------------------------
> w25q32fw 4 50
> w25q64cv 8 30
> w25q64fw 8 100
> w25q128fw 16 200
> s25fl128s 16 ~256
> s25fl256s 32 ~512
>
> From this data, it seems plenty sufficient to say we need to wait for
> 40 seconds for each 2MB of flash.
>
> After this change, it might make some sense to decrease the timeout for
> everything else, as even the most extreme operations (single block
> erase?) shouldn't take more than a handful of seconds. But for safety,
> let's leave it as-is. It's only an error case, after all, so we don't
> exactly need to optimize it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>

Pushed to l2-mtd.git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/