Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] smack: namespace groundwork

[Lukasz Pawelczyk]

On piÄ, 2015-10-16 at 11:04 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > +
> >  static inline void smack_userns_free(struct user_namespace *ns)
> >  {
> >         struct smack_ns *snsp = ns->security;
> > @@ -4680,12 +4689,11 @@ static inline void smack_userns_free(struct
> > user_namespace *ns)
> > 
> >                 mutex_lock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);
> >                 list_del_rcu(&sknp->smk_list_known);
> > -               if (sknp->smk_allocated)
> > -                       kfree(sknp->smk_mapped);
> > -               kfree(sknp);
> >                 mutex_unlock(&skp->smk_mapped_lock);
> > 
> >                 list_del(&sknp->smk_list_ns);
> 
> Is list_del safe, given the operation
> 
> +	mutex_lock(&snsp->smk_mapped_lock);
> +	list_add_rcu(&sknp->smk_list_ns, &snsp->smk_mapped);
> +	mutex_unlock(&snsp->smk_mapped_lock);
> 
> in smk_import_mapped() function(copied below)?

Yes, the namespace is destroyed when all its references are gone. This
also includes processes that were in that namespace. Meaning there is
no way to import a new mapping for them anymore at this point.


-- 
Lukasz Pawelczyk
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/