[PATCH 14/23] perf bench: Harmonize all the -l/--nr_loops options

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Mon Oct 19 2015 - 17:41:54 EST


From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

We have three benchmarking subsystems that specify some sort of 'number
of loops' parameter - but all of them do it inconsistently:

numa: -l/--nr_loops
sched messaging: -l/--loops
mem memset/memcpy: -i/--iterations

Harmonize them to -l/--nr_loops by picking the numa variant - which is
also the most likely one to have existing scripting which we don't want
to break.

Plus improve the parameter help texts to indicate the default value for
the nr_loops variable to keep users from guessing ...

Also propagate the naming to internal variables.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445241870-24854-13-git-send-email-mingo@xxxxxxxxxx
[ Let the harmonisation reach the perf-bench man page as well ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt | 10 +++++-----
tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 ++--
tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
index bbd27d89b50a..ddfb3e10e88c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-bench.txt
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Be multi thread instead of multi process
Specify number of groups

-l::
---loop=::
+--nr_loops=::
Specify number of loops

Example of *messaging*
@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ Specify routine to copy (default: default).
Available routines are depend on the architecture.
On x86-64, x86-64-unrolled, x86-64-movsq and x86-64-movsb are supported.

--i::
---iterations::
+-l::
+--nr_loops::
Repeat memcpy invocation this number of times.

-c::
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ Specify routine to set (default: default).
Available routines are depend on the architecture.
On x86-64, x86-64-unrolled, x86-64-stosq and x86-64-stosb are supported.

--i::
---iterations::
+-l::
+--nr_loops::
Repeat memset invocation this number of times.

-c::
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
index 8d980d4a64e5..c5dfabdbd8d0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
@@ -25,20 +25,20 @@

static const char *size_str = "1MB";
static const char *routine_str = "all";
-static int iterations = 1;
+static int nr_loops = 1;
static bool use_cycles;
static int cycles_fd;

static const struct option options[] = {
- OPT_STRING('l', "size", &size_str, "1MB",
+ OPT_STRING('s', "size", &size_str, "1MB",
"Specify the size of the memory buffers. "
"Available units: B, KB, MB, GB and TB (case insensitive)"),

OPT_STRING('r', "routine", &routine_str, "all",
"Specify the routine to run, \"all\" runs all available routines, \"help\" lists them"),

- OPT_INTEGER('i', "iterations", &iterations,
- "Repeat the function this number of times"),
+ OPT_INTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops,
+ "Specify the number of loops to run. (default: 1)"),

OPT_BOOLEAN('c', "cycles", &use_cycles,
"Use a cycles event instead of gettimeofday() to measure performance"),
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *
init_cycles();

size = (size_t)perf_atoll((char *)size_str);
- size_total = (double)size * iterations;
+ size_total = (double)size * nr_loops;

if ((s64)size <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Invalid size:%s\n", size_str);
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static u64 do_memcpy_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
fn(dst, src, size);

cycle_start = get_cycles();
- for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
fn(dst, src, size);
cycle_end = get_cycles();

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static double do_memcpy_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
fn(dst, src, size);

BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_start, NULL));
- for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
fn(dst, src, size);
BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL));

@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static double do_memcpy_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
free(src);
free(dst);

- return (double)(((double)size * iterations) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
+ return (double)(((double)size * nr_loops) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
}

struct routine memcpy_routines[] = {
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static u64 do_memset_cycles(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
fn(dst, -1, size);

cycle_start = get_cycles();
- for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
fn(dst, i, size);
cycle_end = get_cycles();

@@ -337,14 +337,14 @@ static double do_memset_gettimeofday(const struct routine *r, size_t size)
fn(dst, -1, size);

BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_start, NULL));
- for (i = 0; i < iterations; ++i)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
fn(dst, i, size);
BUG_ON(gettimeofday(&tv_end, NULL));

timersub(&tv_end, &tv_start, &tv_diff);

free(dst);
- return (double)(((double)size * iterations) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
+ return (double)(((double)size * nr_loops) / timeval2double(&tv_diff));
}

static const char * const bench_mem_memset_usage[] = {
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 870b7e665a20..492df2752a2d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
OPT_STRING('L', "mb_proc_locked", &p0.mb_proc_locked_str,"MB", "process serialized/locked memory access (MBs), <= process_memory"),
OPT_STRING('T', "mb_thread" , &p0.mb_thread_str, "MB", "thread memory (MBs)"),

- OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops" , &p0.nr_loops, "max number of loops to run"),
- OPT_UINTEGER('s', "nr_secs" , &p0.nr_secs, "max number of seconds to run"),
+ OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops" , &p0.nr_loops, "max number of loops to run (default: unlimited)"),
+ OPT_UINTEGER('s', "nr_secs" , &p0.nr_secs, "max number of seconds to run (default: 5 secs)"),
OPT_UINTEGER('u', "usleep" , &p0.sleep_usecs, "usecs to sleep per loop iteration"),

OPT_BOOLEAN('R', "data_reads" , &p0.data_reads, "access the data via writes (can be mixed with -W)"),
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c b/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
index d7f281c2828d..d4ff1b539cfd 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#define DATASIZE 100

static bool use_pipes = false;
-static unsigned int loops = 100;
+static unsigned int nr_loops = 100;
static bool thread_mode = false;
static unsigned int num_groups = 10;

@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static void ready(int ready_out, int wakefd)
err(EXIT_FAILURE, "poll");
}

-/* Sender sprays loops messages down each file descriptor */
+/* Sender sprays nr_loops messages down each file descriptor */
static void *sender(struct sender_context *ctx)
{
char data[DATASIZE];
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void *sender(struct sender_context *ctx)
ready(ctx->ready_out, ctx->wakefd);

/* Now pump to every receiver. */
- for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < ctx->num_fds; j++) {
int ret, done = 0;

@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned int group(pthread_t *pth,
/* Create the pipe between client and server */
fdpair(fds);

- ctx->num_packets = num_fds * loops;
+ ctx->num_packets = num_fds * nr_loops;
ctx->in_fds[0] = fds[0];
ctx->in_fds[1] = fds[1];
ctx->ready_out = ready_out;
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
OPT_BOOLEAN('t', "thread", &thread_mode,
"Be multi thread instead of multi process"),
OPT_UINTEGER('g', "group", &num_groups, "Specify number of groups"),
- OPT_UINTEGER('l', "loop", &loops, "Specify number of loops"),
+ OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops, "Specify the number of loops to run (default: 100)"),
OPT_END()
};

--
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/