Re: [PATCH 1/2] wait/ptrace: always assume __WALL if the child is traced

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Oct 20 2015 - 18:32:06 EST


On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:17:54 +0200 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The following program (simplified version of generated by syzkaller)
>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/ptrace.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> void *thread_func(void *arg)
> {
> ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0,0);
> return 0;
> }
>
> int main(void)
> {
> pthread_t thread;
>
> if (fork())
> return 0;
>
> while (getppid() != 1)
> ;
>
> pthread_create(&thread, NULL, thread_func, NULL);
> pthread_join(thread, NULL);
> return 0;
> }
>
> creates the unreapable zombie if /sbin/init doesn't use __WALL.
>
> This is not a kernel bug, at least in a sense that everything works as
> expected: debugger should reap a traced sub-thread before it can reap
> the leader, but without __WALL/__WCLONE do_wait() ignores sub-threads.
>
> Unfortunately, it seems that /sbin/init in most (all?) distributions
> doesn't use it and we have to change the kernel to avoid the problem.

Well, to fix this a distro needs to roll out a new kernel. Or a new
init(8). Is there any reason to believe that distributing/deploying a
new kernel is significantly easier for everyone? Because fixing init
sounds like a much preferable solution to this problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/