Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Tue Oct 27 2015 - 01:57:04 EST

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:46 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:42:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Sure, sounds fine, I just fervently hope that the below is foul swamp
> > gas having nothing what so ever to do with your definition of "saner".
> lol, idk, you keep taking things in weird directions. Let's just stay
> technical, okay?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not into begging. I really don't want to have to ask anyone to
> > pretty please do for me what I can currently do all by my little self
> > without having to give a rats ass less whether what I want to do fits in
> > the world view of this or that obnoxious little control freak.
> Well, if you think certain things are being missed, please speak up.
> Not in some media campaign way but with technical reasoning and
> justifications.

Inserting a middle-man is extremely unlikely to improve performance.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at