Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: ftrace: fix incorrect output from stack tracer
From: Will Deacon
Date: Wed Oct 28 2015 - 11:23:54 EST
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:01:37PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> This is the third patch series for fixing stack tracer on arm64.
> The original issue was reported by Jungseok, and then I found more
> (Steven, Jungseok, sorry for not replying to your comments directly.)
> I address here all the issues and implement fixes described in  except
> for interrupt-triggered problems, ie. II-3). Recent discussions about
> introducing a dedicated interrupt stack suggests that we may avoid walking
> through from an interrupt stack to a process stack.
> (So interrupt-stack patch is a prerequisite.)
> patch1 corresponds to the original issue.
> patch2 is a proactive improvement of function_graph tracer.
> patch3 corresponds to II-4(functions under function_graph tracer).
> patch4 corresponds to II-5(leaf function).
> patch5, 6 and 7 correspond to II-1(slurping stack) and II-2(differences
> between x86 and arm64).
> Each fix can be applied independently, but if patch5, 6 and 7 are
> acceptable, patch1 is not necessary because patch7 replaces a default
> stack tracer.
Given the comments and kbuild robot build errors, do you plan to post a
new version of this series?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/