Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: prepare page_referenced() and page_idle to new THP refcounting

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Thu Nov 05 2015 - 07:36:15 EST


On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:07:26PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> @@ -849,30 +836,23 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (pmd_page(*pmd) != page)
> goto unlock_pmd;
>
> - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> - pra->vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
> - ret = SWAP_FAIL; /* To break the loop */
> - goto unlock_pmd;
> - }
> -
> - if (pmdp_clear_flush_young_notify(vma, address, pmd))
> - referenced++;
> - spin_unlock(ptl);
> + pte = (pte_t *)pmd;

pmd_t and pte_t are not always compatible. We shouldn't pretend they are.
And we shouldn't use pte_unmap_unlock() to unlock pmd table.

What about interface like this (I'm not sure about helper's name):

void page_check_address_transhuge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address,
pmd_t **pmdp, pte_t **ptep,
spinlock_t **ptlp);

page_check_address_transhuge(page, mm, address, &pmd, &pte, &ptl);
if (pmd) {
/* handle pmd... */
} else if (pte) {
/* handle pte... */
} else {
return SWAP_AGAIN;
}

/* common stuff */

if (pmd)
spin_unlock(ptl);
else
pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);

/* ... */

The helper shouldn't set pmd if the page is tracked to pte.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/