Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
From: Caesar Wang
Date: Sat Nov 07 2015 - 09:42:51 EST
Hello Eduardo,
å 2015å11æ07æ 03:00, Eduardo Valentin åé:
Hello Caesar,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
We should make the conversion table in as a parameter since the different
SoCs have the different conversionion table.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
- make the conversion table in as a parameter both code_to_temp
and temp_to_code function.
Now it looks cleaner. Thanks.
The comments below are probably not directly on this change. You may
want to add a different patch that takes care of the suggestions that
follows.
Okay, I will send a another patch to fix it.
Thanks your reviewing this patch.
Series-changes: 1
- As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
Changes in v1: None
drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
index bdf7063..e828f18 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
@@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
*/
#define SOC_MAX_SENSORS 2
+struct chip_tsadc_table {
+ const struct tsadc_table *id;
+
+ /* the array table size*/
+ unsigned int length;
+
+ /* that analogic mask data */
+ unsigned long data_mask;
Are you sure this need to be long?
Seem.....we should mark the 'unsigned int or u32'.
+};
+
struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
/* The sensor id of chip correspond to the ADC channel */
int chn_id[SOC_MAX_SENSORS];
@@ -74,9 +84,14 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
void (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
/* Per-sensor methods */
- int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
- void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
+ int (*get_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
+ int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
+ void (*set_tshut_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
+ int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
Temperature is currently represented as int not long in the thermal
framework. You may want to send a different patch that normalize the
temperature representation in your driver (long -> int).
Okay
void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
+
+ /* Per-table methods */
+ struct chip_tsadc_table table;
};
struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
@@ -172,21 +187,22 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
{3421, 125000},
};
-static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
+static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
+ long temp)
Same comment here.
Okay
{
int high, low, mid;
low = 0;
- high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
+ high = table.length - 1;
mid = (high + low) / 2;
- if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
+ if (temp < table.id[low].temp || temp > table.id[high].temp)
return 0;
while (low <= high) {
- if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
- return v2_code_table[mid].code;
- else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
+ if (temp == table.id[mid].temp)
+ return table.id[mid].code;
+ else if (temp < table.id[mid].temp)
high = mid - 1;
else
low = mid + 1;
@@ -196,25 +212,26 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
return 0;
}
-static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
+static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
+ int *temp)
Here you are ok already.
{
unsigned int low = 1;
- unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
+ unsigned int high = table.length - 1;
unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
unsigned int num;
unsigned long denom;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) < 2);
+ WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
- code &= TSADCV2_DATA_MASK;
- if (code < v2_code_table[high].code)
+ code &= table.data_mask;
+ if (code < table.id[high].code)
return -EAGAIN; /* Incorrect reading */
while (low <= high) {
- if (code >= v2_code_table[mid].code &&
- code < v2_code_table[mid - 1].code)
+ if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
+ code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
break;
- else if (code < v2_code_table[mid].code)
+ else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
low = mid + 1;
else
high = mid - 1;
@@ -227,10 +244,10 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
* temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
* to produce less granular result.
*/
- num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
- num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
- denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
- *temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
+ num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
+ num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
+ denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
+ *temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
return 0;
}
@@ -290,20 +307,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
}
-static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
+static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
+ int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
{
u32 val;
val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
- return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
+ return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(table, val, temp);
}
-static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
+static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
+ int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
Here needs fixing.
Okay.
BR,
Eduardo Valentin
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/