Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] ARM: EXYNOS: rearrange static and non-static functions of PMU driver

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Nov 20 2015 - 00:11:22 EST


On 20.11.2015 13:46, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch moves exynos_sys_powerdown_conf function above all
>> static functions, to avoid confusion causing due to mixing of
>> static-nonstatic-static functions and to improve readability of this
>> driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
>> index 01cb649..a7741d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
>> @@ -39,23 +39,6 @@ u32 pmu_raw_readl(u32 offset)
>> return readl_relaxed(pmu_base_addr + offset);
>> }
>>
>> -static void exynos_power_off(void)
>> -{
>> - unsigned int tmp;
>> -
>> - pr_info("Power down.\n");
>> - tmp = pmu_raw_readl(EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
>> - tmp ^= (1 << 8);
>> - pmu_raw_writel(tmp, EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
>> -
>> - /* Wait a little so we don't give a false warning below */
>> - mdelay(100);
>> -
>> - pr_err("Power down failed, please power off system manually.\n");
>> - while (1)
>> - ;
>> -}
>> -
>> void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode)
>> {
>> unsigned int i;
>> @@ -85,6 +68,23 @@ void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void exynos_power_off(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int tmp;
>> +
>> + pr_info("Power down.\n");
>> + tmp = pmu_raw_readl(EXYNOS_PS_HOLD_CONTROL);
>> + tmp ^= (1 << 8);
> Can we have some define over here? to operate this bit.
>

1. This will be removed by syscon-reboot/poweroff patches [0].
2. This patch is only rename/move. Fixing stuff should go to separate
patches. But IMHO fixing is not needed because of 1.

[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg98858.html

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/