Re: enhance ONFI table reliability/stable

[Brian Norris]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 08:46:04AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This being said, I don't know how you would change the ONFI spec and
> keep it compatible with the previous version. As I said, the current
> version of the spec does not reserve any area after the mandatory
> parameter pages...
> You'll probably have to add a NAND_CMD_ALT_PARAM to support this kind
> of thing.

I was interpreting Bean's comments to mean only a change in software,
not in the actual NAND flash (HW) implementation. If he is suggesting a
change in the flash spec, then that's a completely different discussion.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/