Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping

From: Dan Williams
Date: Wed Dec 02 2015 - 12:33:44 EST


On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, I see. I will setup the memmap array and run the tests again.
>
> But, why does the PMD mapping depend on the memmap array? We have observed
> major performance improvement with PMD. This feature should always be enabled
> with DAX regardless of the option to allocate the memmap array.
>

Several factors drove this decision, I'm open to considering
alternatives but here's the reasoning:

1/ DAX pmd mappings caused crashes in the get_user_pages path leading
to commit e82c9ed41e8 "dax: disable pmd mappings". The reason pte
mappings don't crash and instead trigger -EFAULT is due to the
_PAGE_SPECIAL pte bit.

2/ To enable get_user_pages for DAX, in both the page and huge-page
case, we need a new pte bit _PAGE_DEVMAP.

3/ Given the pte bits are hard to come I'm assuming we won't get two,
i.e. both _PAGE_DEVMAP and a new _PAGE_SPECIAL for pmds. Even if we
could get a _PAGE_SPECIAL for pmds I'm not in favor of pursuing it.

End result is that DAX pmd mappings must be fully enabled through the
get_user_pages paths with _PAGE_DEVMAP or turned off completely. In
general I think the "page less" DAX implementation was a good starting
point, but we need to shift to page-backed by default until we can
teach more of the kernel to operate on bare pfns. That "default" will
need to be enforced by userspace tooling.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/