Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] dm verity: add support for error correction

[Mike Snitzer]

On Mon, Dec 07 2015 at  8:21am -0500,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:09:35PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I'd really appreciate it if you could do some regression testing,
> > etc on your end to verify I didn't break anything while tweaking
> > things.
> 
> Sure. The changes look fine. I applied them to my tree and everything
> still works as expected in my tests.

Great.  Moving forward it'd be awesome if you could work to get your
verity FEC support regression tests into cryptsetup's tests.  We need a
way to verify future DM and/or other kernel changes don't somehow cause
this FEC support to regress.

Also, I know you said you'd be getting Milan a veritysetup patch soon.
How are things going on that?  Ideally that'll land in conjunction with
the kernel's dm-verity FEC support.

> Thanks for taking the time to review the patches!

No problem, like I said I'll be reviewing the code further but at this
point your changes seem to be on-track for upstream Linux 4.5
inclusion.

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/