Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] acpica: Correct parameter type to acpi_evaluate_dsm
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Dec 13 2015 - 21:07:31 EST
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and
> "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers
> are 64 bit quantities.
> The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int"
> which are 32 bits. Correct type passed to acpi_evaluate_dsm
> and its callers and derived callers to pass correct type.
> acpi_check_dsm and acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed had similar issue
> and were corrected as well.
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx>
The changes look OK to me, but this is not ACPICA material.
Please change the subject to something like "ACPI / utils: Fix
acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type".
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/