Re: [PATCH 03/06] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Break out utlb control function

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Dec 15 2015 - 10:48:48 EST


Hi Magnus,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- 0004/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c 2015-12-15 13:17:40.580513000 +0900
> @@ -279,9 +279,18 @@ static void ipmmu_utlb_enable(struct ipm
> static void ipmmu_utlb_disable(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain,
> unsigned int utlb)
> {
> - struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = domain->mmu;
> + ipmmu_write(domain->mmu, IMUCTR(utlb), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void ipmmu_utlb_ctrl(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain,
> + void (*fn)(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *,
> + unsigned int utlb), struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct ipmmu_vmsa_dev_data *dev_data = get_dev_data(dev);
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - ipmmu_write(mmu, IMUCTR(utlb), 0);
> + for (i = 0; i < dev_data->num_utlbs; ++i)
> + fn(domain, dev_data->utlbs[i]);
> }

Unless you have further plans with the "fn" parameter, I would simply pass
a bool enable/disable flag instead of a function pointer.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/