Re: [PATCH 00/10] bpf samples: Uses libbpf in tools/lib to do BPF operations

[Daniel Wagner]

On 12/17/2015 07:51 AM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote:
>>> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain
>>> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf.
>>>
>>> In patchset:
>>>
>>>   Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support
>>>   samples,
>>>
>>>   Patch 8/10 adds utils.[ch], which creates similar API like old
>>>   bpf_load.c and libbpf.c.
>>>
>>>   Patch 9/10 replace all sampels to use API provides by utils.[ch] and
>>>   libbpf.
>>>
>>>   Patch 10/10 removes unneeded files.
>> Which tree did you use for your patches? I tried to apply them against
>> mainline and net-next which didn't really work out.
> 
> These patches based on Arnaldo's 'perf/core' because of those libbpf
> changes.

Okay, I'll try with this one.

> Which tree is the right one for this? net-next?

The patches I was involved were routed via net-next but I don't know if
that is the right tree for this patch set.

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/