Re: [char-misc-next 4/7] watchdog: mei_wdt: add status debugfs entry

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sun Dec 20 2015 - 05:40:42 EST


On 12/20/2015 01:44 AM, Winkler, Tomas wrote:

On 12/17/2015 06:49 AM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
Add entry for dumping current watchdog internal state

Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c | 84
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
index 3c97deb70d90..a3f1c1613c32 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/watchdog.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>

#include <linux/uuid.h>
#include <linux/mei_cl_bus.h>
@@ -54,6 +55,19 @@ enum mei_wdt_state {
MEI_WDT_STOPPING,
};

+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
+static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
+{
+ switch (state) {
+ case MEI_WDT_IDLE: return "IDLE";
+ case MEI_WDT_START: return "START";
+ case MEI_WDT_RUNNING: return "RUNNING";
+ case MEI_WDT_STOPPING: return "STOPPING";
+ default: return "unknown";

Doesn't this cause checkpatch warnings ?
It doesn't and also checkpatch.pl is just a help tool.

I should have said "Doesn't this violate the single-statement-per-line"
coding style rule, but I guess then you'd argue that "case xxx:" is not
a statement.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/