Adding OTP-only device to MTD or CHAR subsystem?

From: Scott Branden
Date: Mon Dec 28 2015 - 18:21:28 EST


Greg/Brian/Arnd,

We have OTP device drivers for accessing OTP memory in our SoCs.

I looking for the right place and model to place such OTP device drivers.

1) Should we follow the bfin-otp model in drivers/char? This doesn't seem like the right place to put it although following the bfin example is quite simple to implement. We actually had a custom set of Ioctl's that I changed to use the standard file access model used by the bfin driver. But a custom util is still needed to issue an OTPLOCK command. I'm guess mtd-utils has such abilities (or should).

2) Instead, should we start adding OTP-only drivers into the MTD subsystem? Onenand and CFI based MTD devices already have OTP programmable regions. If we created a new OTP device type in the MTD subsystem this looks like a good thing to do. mtd-utils could/should be used to access the OTP device then along with standard fileio operations.

3) Or some other suggestion of where to place OTP device drivers?

Regards,
Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/