Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] tpm_tis: Clean up the force=1 module parameter

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Sun Jan 03 2016 - 12:26:59 EST


On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:23:18AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The TPM core has long assumed that every device has a driver attached,
> however the force path was attaching the TPM core outside of a driver
> context. This isn't generally reliable as the user could detatch the
> driver using sysfs or something, but commit b8b2c7d845d5 ("base/platform:
> assert that dev_pm_domain callbacks are called unconditionally")
> forced the issue by leaving the driver pointer NULL if there is
> no probe.
>
> Rework the TPM setup to create a platform device with resources and
> then allow the driver core to naturally bind and probe it through the
> normal mechanisms. All this structure is needed anyhow to enable TPM
> for OF environments.
>
> Finally, since the entire flow is changing convert the init/exit to use
> the modern ifdef-less coding style when possible
>
> Reported-by: "Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Wilck, Martin <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> index 856fb35e574c..12aa96a69b6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ enum tis_int_flags {
> };
>
> enum tis_defaults {
> - TIS_MEM_BASE = 0xFED40000,
> TIS_MEM_LEN = 0x5000,
> TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT = 750, /* ms */
> TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT = 2000, /* 2 sec */
> @@ -75,15 +74,6 @@ struct tpm_info {
> int irq;
> };
>
> -static struct tpm_info tis_default_info = {
> - .res = {
> - .start = TIS_MEM_BASE,
> - .end = TIS_MEM_BASE + TIS_MEM_LEN - 1,
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - },
> - .irq = 0,
> -};
> -
> /* Some timeout values are needed before it is known whether the chip is
> * TPM 1.0 or TPM 2.0.
> */
> @@ -695,8 +685,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_info *tpm_info,
> #endif
>
> chip->vendor.iobase = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &tpm_info->res);
> - if (!chip->vendor.iobase)
> - return -EIO;
> + if (IS_ERR(chip->vendor.iobase))
> + return PTR_ERR(chip->vendor.iobase);

Isn't this a regression in the descendig patch in this series?

> /* Maximum timeouts */
> chip->vendor.timeout_a = TIS_TIMEOUT_A_MAX;
> @@ -825,7 +815,6 @@ out_err:
> return rc;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static void tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> u32 intmask;
> @@ -867,11 +856,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif
>
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tpm_tis_pm, tpm_pm_suspend, tpm_tis_resume);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev,
> const struct pnp_device_id *pnp_id)
> {
> @@ -889,14 +876,12 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev,
> else
> tpm_info.irq = -1;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> if (pnp_acpi_device(pnp_dev)) {
> if (is_itpm(pnp_acpi_device(pnp_dev)))
> itpm = true;
>
> - acpi_dev_handle = pnp_acpi_device(pnp_dev)->handle;
> + acpi_dev_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pnp_dev->dev);
> }
> -#endif
>
> return tpm_tis_init(&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info, acpi_dev_handle);
> }
> @@ -937,7 +922,6 @@ static struct pnp_driver tis_pnp_driver = {
> module_param_string(hid, tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id,
> sizeof(tpm_pnp_tbl[TIS_HID_USR_IDX].id), 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(hid, "Set additional specific HID for this driver to probe");
> -#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static int tpm_check_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> @@ -1024,80 +1008,135 @@ static struct acpi_driver tis_acpi_driver = {
> };
> #endif
>
> +static struct platform_device *force_pdev;
> +
> +static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct tpm_info tpm_info = {};
> + struct resource *res;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (res == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no memory resource defined\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + tpm_info.res = *res;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> + if (res) {
> + tpm_info.irq = res->start;
> + } else {
> + if (pdev == force_pdev)
> + tpm_info.irq = -1;
> + else
> + /* When forcing auto probe the IRQ */
> + tpm_info.irq = 0;
> + }
> +
> + return tpm_tis_init(&pdev->dev, &tpm_info, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int tpm_tis_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + tpm_chip_unregister(chip);
> + tpm_tis_remove(chip);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct platform_driver tis_drv = {
> + .probe = tpm_tis_plat_probe,
> + .remove = tpm_tis_plat_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "tpm_tis",
> .pm = &tpm_tis_pm,
> },
> };
>
> -static struct platform_device *pdev;
> -
> static bool force;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> module_param(force, bool, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(force, "Force device probe rather than using ACPI entry");
> +#endif
> +
> +static int tpm_tis_force_device(void)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + static const struct resource x86_resources[] = {
> + {
> + .start = 0xFED40000,
> + .end = 0xFED40000 + TIS_MEM_LEN - 1,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + if (!force)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* The driver core will match the name tpm_tis of the device to
> + * the tpm_tis platform driver and complete the setup via
> + * tpm_tis_plat_probe
> + */
> + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("tpm_tis", -1, x86_resources,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(x86_resources));
> + if (IS_ERR(pdev))
> + return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> + force_pdev = pdev;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init init_tis(void)
> {
> int rc;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> - if (!force) {
> - rc = pnp_register_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> - }
> -#endif
> +
> + rc = tpm_tis_force_device();
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_force;
> +
> + rc = platform_driver_register(&tis_drv);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_platform;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> - if (!force) {
> - rc = acpi_bus_register_driver(&tis_acpi_driver);
> - if (rc) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> - pnp_unregister_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
> -#endif
> - return rc;
> - }
> - }
> + rc = acpi_bus_register_driver(&tis_acpi_driver);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_acpi;
> #endif
> - if (!force)
> - return 0;
>
> - rc = platform_driver_register(&tis_drv);
> - if (rc < 0)
> - return rc;
> - pdev = platform_device_register_simple("tpm_tis", -1, NULL, 0);
> - if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> - rc = PTR_ERR(pdev);
> - goto err_dev;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PNP)) {
> + rc = pnp_register_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_pnp;
> }
> - rc = tpm_tis_init(&pdev->dev, &tis_default_info, NULL);
> - if (rc)
> - goto err_init;
> +
> return 0;
> -err_init:
> - platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> -err_dev:
> - platform_driver_unregister(&tis_drv);
> +
> +err_pnp:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&tis_acpi_driver);
> +err_acpi:
> +#endif
> + platform_device_unregister(force_pdev);
> +err_platform:
> + if (force_pdev)
> + platform_device_unregister(force_pdev);
> +err_force:
> return rc;
> }
>
> static void __exit cleanup_tis(void)
> {
> - struct tpm_chip *chip;
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PNP) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI)
> - if (!force) {
> + pnp_unregister_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> - acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&tis_acpi_driver);
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PNP
> - pnp_unregister_driver(&tis_pnp_driver);
> -#endif
> - return;
> - }
> + acpi_bus_unregister_driver(&tis_acpi_driver);
> #endif
> - chip = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> - tpm_chip_unregister(chip);
> - tpm_tis_remove(chip);
> - platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> platform_driver_unregister(&tis_drv);
> +
> + if (force_pdev)
> + platform_device_unregister(force_pdev);
> }
>
> module_init(init_tis);
> --
> 2.1.4
>

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/