Re: [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 4/4] ARM: Allow IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE to exploit FIQ

[Daniel Thompson]

On 20/12/15 22:12, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.4-rc5]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20151218]
> [cannot apply to tip/irq/core]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Thompson/irq-arm-Use-FIQ-for-NMI-backtrace-when-possible/20151221-045854
> config: arm-iop-adma (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>          wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>          make.cross ARCH=arm
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>     arch/arm/kernel/traps.c: In function 'handle_fiq_as_nmi':
> > > arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:489:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'handle_arch_irq' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       handle_arch_irq(regs);
>       ^
>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Thanks. I'll look at this.


> vim +/handle_arch_irq +489 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
>
>     483		 * Either the interrupt controller supports FIQ, meaning it will
>     484		 * do the right thing with this call, or we will end up treating a
>     485		 * spurious FIQ (which is normally fatal) as though it were an IRQ
>     486		 * which, although it risks deadlock, still gives us a sporting
>     487		 * chance of surviving long enough to log errors.
>     488		 */
>   > 489		handle_arch_irq(regs);
>     490	
>     491		nmi_exit();
>     492	
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/