Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlbfs: Unmap pages if page fault raced with hole punch

From: Mike Kravetz
Date: Mon Jan 11 2016 - 18:39:34 EST


On 01/11/2016 02:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:37:04 -0800 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Page faults can race with fallocate hole punch. If a page fault happens
>> between the unmap and remove operations, the page is not removed and
>> remains within the hole. This is not the desired behavior. The race
>> is difficult to detect in user level code as even in the non-race
>> case, a page within the hole could be faulted back in before fallocate
>> returns. If userfaultfd is expanded to support hugetlbfs in the future,
>> this race will be easier to observe.
>>
>> If this race is detected and a page is mapped, the remove operation
>> (remove_inode_hugepages) will unmap the page before removing. The unmap
>> within remove_inode_hugepages occurs with the hugetlb_fault_mutex held
>> so that no other faults will be processed until the page is removed.
>>
>> The (unmodified) routine hugetlb_vmdelete_list was moved ahead of
>> remove_inode_hugepages to satisfy the new reference.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>
>> ...
>>
>> @@ -395,37 +431,43 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>> mapping, next, 0);
>> mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>>
>> - lock_page(page);
>> - if (likely(!page_mapped(page))) {
>
> hm, what are the locking requirements for page_mapped()?

page_mapped is just reading/evaluating an atomic within the struct page
which we have a referene on from the pagevec_lookup. But, I think the
question is what prevents page_mapped from changing after we check it?

The patch takes the hugetlb_fault_mutex_table lock before checking
page_mapped. If the page is unmapped and the hugetlb_fault_mutex_table
is held, it can not be faulted in and change from unmapped to mapped.

The new comment in the patch about taking hugetlb_fault_mutex_table is
right before the check for page_mapped.

>
>> - bool rsv_on_error = !PagePrivate(page);
>> - /*
>> - * We must free the huge page and remove
>> - * from page cache (remove_huge_page) BEFORE
>> - * removing the region/reserve map
>> - * (hugetlb_unreserve_pages). In rare out
>> - * of memory conditions, removal of the
>> - * region/reserve map could fail. Before
>> - * free'ing the page, note PagePrivate which
>> - * is used in case of error.
>> - */
>> - remove_huge_page(page);
>
> And remove_huge_page().

The page must be locked before calling remove_huge_page, since it will
call delete_from_page_cache. It currently is locked. Would you prefer
a comment stating this before the call?

--
Mike Kravetz

>
>> - freed++;
>> - if (!truncate_op) {
>> - if (unlikely(hugetlb_unreserve_pages(
>> - inode, next,
>> - next + 1, 1)))
>> - hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts(
>> - inode, rsv_on_error);
>> - }
>>
>> ...
>>