Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Jan 15 2016 - 04:31:24 EST
Hi Rich, Sato-san,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
>> > > From: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
>> > >
>> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh
>> > > (SUPERH).
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Acked-by: D. Jeff Dionne <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > A much appreciated move,
>> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't
> think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can
> it be committed now? Geert? Andrew?
I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending
on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have
a git repo to pull from.
Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch
for linux-next integration testing?
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds